A sociologist at the University of Maryland who wrote a blog post critiquing the paper, told The Verge: вЂњPeople are scared of a situation where you have a private life and your sexual orientation isnвЂ™t known, and you go to an airport or a sporting event and a computer scans the crowd and identifies whether youвЂ™re gay or straight as Philip Cohen. But thereвЂ™s simply not evidence that is much technology may do that.вЂќ
Kosinski and Wang make this clear on their own toward the final end for the paper once they test their system against 1,000 photographs in place of two.
They ask the AI to choose that is likely become homosexual in a dataset by which 7 per cent regarding the picture topics are homosexual, roughly showing the percentage of right and homosexual guys within the US population. When expected to choose the 100 people almost certainly become homosexual, the system gets just 47 away from 70 hits that are possible. The rest of the 53 have now been improperly identified. When asked to identify a premier 10, nine are appropriate.
You couldnвЂ™t know for sure you were getting correct answers if you were a bad actor trying to use this system to identify gay people. Although, in the event that you tried it against a sizable sufficient dataset, you will get mostly proper guesses. Continue reading A figure through the paper showing the common faces regarding the individuals, together with huge difference in facial structures which they identified between your two sets. Image: Kosinski and Wang